In the week when the media spread the statement above, that science has made unnecessary the hypothesis of a creator, I found myself in need, Sunday homily to explain in very simple Christians in a town of Rieti, where is the fundamental mistake of scientists and atheists because they were not to be impressed by the sensation aroused by that statement. I did it with an example that might be useful to repeat here in a context so different.
There are night birds, like the owl and the owl, whose eye is made to see in the dark of night, not day. The sunlight blinds them. These birds know it all and move at their home in the world overnight, but know nothing of the world day. We adopt for a moment the kind of stories, where animals talk to each them. Suppose that an eagle face friendship with a family of owls and talk to them about themselves: how it illuminates everything, how, without him, everything would plunge into the dark and cold, as their own nocturnal world would not exist without the sun . What if the owl does not respond, "You tell fibs! Never saw your sun. We move very well and we get the food without it, your sun is unnecessary and therefore there is no hypothesis. "
is exactly what the atheist scientist when he says: "God does not exist." Rate a world he does not know its laws apply to an object that is beyond their reach. To see God you must open one eye different, should venture out of the night. In this sense, is still valid in the old assertion of the Psalmist: "The fool says there is no God."
source: http://www.cantalamessa.org/it/predicheView.php?id=380
0 comments:
Post a Comment